In today’s fast-moving manufacturing sector, financial precision and real-time insight are critical for maintaining competitiveness, without them you risk falling behind fast.
But with an ever-growing range of accounting software for manufacturing companies, many businesses face a difficult decision: should they invest in dedicated software or rely on a professional accountancy agency, such as Pulse Accountants, that specialises in manufacturing finance management?
In this article, we’ll explore the pros and cons of manufacturing accounting software versus using an agency, review trusted data, and identify the best approach for different business types.
Unlike service-based businesses, manufacturers must track the cost of goods sold (COGS), monitor work-in-progress (WIP), and account for variable production costs. Generic accounting platforms often struggle to manage these complexities.
According to data from Sage UK (2024), manufacturers lose an estimated 12 hours per week managing spreadsheets and reconciling manual entries when using general accounting tools — a loss that equates to £25,000 per year in wasted labour for an SME-sized operation.
A capable manufacturing accounting system integrates seamlessly with inventory management, production planning, and procurement. It should:
|
Feature |
Why It Matters |
Example Tools |
|
Inventory tracking |
Real-time visibility of stock levels prevents over-ordering and under-supply. |
Katana, MRPeasy |
|
Job costing |
Tracks labour, material, and overhead costs per unit or batch. |
QuickBooks Enterprise, Fishbowl |
|
Integration |
Connects with CRM, payroll, and ERP systems for unified data. |
Xero + Cin7, Sage Intacct |
|
Compliance automation |
Ensures adherence to HMRC, VAT, and Making Tax Digital (MTD) requirements. |
Sage, Xero |
These functions go beyond traditional bookkeeping — they empower manufacturers to make data-driven production and pricing decisions.
Matt McConnell, Director of Pulse Accountants, notes:
“We’ve seen a major shift in how manufacturing firms handle their accounts. Software has become more powerful, but without the right financial expertise behind it, it’s easy for businesses to lose sight of profitability drivers. The best results often come from combining smart software with specialist advice.”
However, relying solely on even the best software for manufacturing accounting has drawbacks:
A 2024 report by Accounting Today found that 63% of SME manufacturers using only in-house software misclassified labour costs in at least one quarterly report, leading to distorted profitability analysis.
Matt McConnell adds:
“Technology is a brilliant enabler — but it can’t replace the human insight that spots patterns, questions anomalies, and ensures compliance. Many of our clients come to us after discovering errors that software didn’t flag.”
When choosing between manufacturing accounting software and an accountancy agency such as Pulse Accountants, decision-makers must assess factors like scalability, control, compliance, and return on investment (ROI).
To clarify these considerations, the table below highlights the comparative strengths and weaknesses of each option:
|
Aspect |
Manufacturing Accounting Software |
Specialist Accounting Agency (e.g. Pulse Accountants) |
|
Cost Structure |
Typically subscription-based (low initial cost). |
Retainer or project-based fees, higher short-term cost but strategic ROI. |
|
Ease of Implementation |
Quick to deploy but may require technical configuration and training. |
Requires onboarding but no technical maintenance from your side. |
|
Scalability |
Excellent — cloud platforms can scale with business size. |
Scales through service packages and strategic planning. |
|
Compliance Assurance |
Depends on user accuracy and updates. |
Managed and reviewed by regulated professionals. |
|
Insight Quality |
Strong on data capture, weaker on interpretation. |
Provides strategic financial insight and forecasting. |
|
Human Oversight |
Minimal — relies on automation. |
High — proactive issue identification and advisory. |
|
Data Security |
Depends on software provider’s encryption standards. |
Agencies use secure accounting suites and adhere to GDPR compliance. |
|
Integration with Operations |
Integrates with ERP, CRM, and inventory systems. |
Integrates financial strategy with business operations. |
Matt McConnell, Director of Pulse Accountants, explains:
“Many manufacturers start with off-the-shelf accounting software for convenience — and that’s fine. But as the business grows, financial complexity increases. That’s where having an expert partner who understands both the data and the industry makes the real difference. We bridge that gap for our clients.”
The UK manufacturing sector is undergoing a significant digital shift. According to the Make UK 2024 Manufacturing Outlook Report, over 78% of UK manufacturers have either implemented or are in the process of adopting digital accounting and production systems.
This adoption has been driven by initiatives like Making Tax Digital (MTD) and by growing competition in global markets. Modern accounting software for manufacturing now includes real-time dashboards, AI-driven forecasting, and cloud-based collaboration.
However, while automation reduces manual work, it cannot replicate professional judgment — especially when interpreting data or applying regulatory nuance.
A powerful approach is to combine software efficiency with expert oversight.
This approach provides the best of both worlds:
The following case study illustrates how expert human insight can significantly amplify the value of accounting software — particularly for manufacturing firms where cost structures are complex and margins are tight.
Client: A medium-sized manufacturing company based in the Midlands.
Company Profile:
This manufacturer had invested in technology but lacked the internal financial expertise to interpret the data effectively. As a result, operational decisions were often based on surface-level reports that did not reveal the deeper drivers of profitability.
|
Stage |
Software Only |
Software + Pulse Accountants |
|
Client Context |
A medium-sized manufacturing company using QuickBooks Enterprise to monitor production costs. |
Same company after engaging Pulse Accountants for sector-specific financial oversight. |
|
Challenge |
Struggling to understand true job-level profitability. Overheads were allocated automatically but inconsistently. |
Required deeper analysis of overhead recovery, production variances, and contract-level costing. |
|
Approach |
Relied on automated cost allocation, inventory valuation, and job-costing modules built into the software. |
Pulse implemented cost-centre reporting, variance analysis, and a structured costing model aligned with manufacturing workflows. |
|
Outcome |
Reports were technically accurate but lacked interpretation, which led to misaligned pricing decisions. |
Identified £120,000 of unprofitable contracts and redesigned the company’s pricing model. |
|
Result |
4% annual margin decline due to mispriced jobs and unnoticed inefficiencies. |
9% margin increase within six months through improved cost allocations and better pricing strategies. |
Matt McConnell comments:
“Our job isn’t just to process figures — it’s to translate them into actionable insight. By reviewing the data from their accounting system, we helped the client pinpoint inefficiencies and adjust their production costing model. The impact was immediate and measurable.”
While the best accounting software for manufacturing delivers strong functionality, over-reliance can lead to serious pitfalls.
Manufacturers often face indirect costs — such as equipment depreciation, setup time, and quality control — that are missed when using default templates.
According to a CIMA study (2023), 46% of SME manufacturers underestimate production costs by 5–10% when using basic software configurations.
Software-generated reports may not match management’s key performance indicators (KPIs), causing confusion when analysing profitability across departments or product lines.
Automation can streamline tasks but can also introduce errors when configuration settings are incorrect. As Matt McConnell points out:
“Automation only works as well as the data you feed into it. We often audit clients’ accounting software and find misclassifications that distort their financial outlook.”
Software provides data — not direction. Without an accountant’s interpretation, businesses might misread financial trends, delay corrective action, or miss tax incentives.
Many manufacturers choose to fully or partly outsource their accounting function to specialist agencies. This unlocks several benefits that can be difficult or costly to achieve in-house:
The result is a modern, efficient accounting approach where technology handles the routine, and experts handle the critical decisions that influence performance, profitability, and compliance.
As the manufacturing industry continues to digitalise, the decision between accounting software for manufacturing and professional agency support depends on each business’s operational complexity, internal resources, and long-term objectives.
Below is a final comparative summary outlining the key pros and cons of each option:
|
Approach |
Pros |
Cons |
|
Manufacturing Accounting Software |
- Real-time data and dashboards - Lower upfront costs - Easy scalability - Integration with ERP and MRP tools |
- Limited interpretation and strategic advice - Requires internal accounting knowledge - Risk of compliance errors - Hidden costs for training and add-ons |
|
Accounting Agency (e.g. Pulse Accountants) |
- Expert human oversight - Strategic financial analysis - Tax planning and compliance confidence - In-depth manufacturing insight |
- Higher short-term cost - Reliant on external collaboration - Less immediate control over daily data input |
Matt McConnell, Director of Pulse Accountants, summarises:
“Software alone is like having a calculator — powerful but only as good as the person using it. Accountants bring that professional oversight, translating figures into financial clarity and ensuring manufacturing businesses make smart, compliant, and profitable decisions.”
Smaller manufacturers with simpler production processes might benefit from starting with accounting software for manufacturing industry solutions. Larger, multi-site, or export-driven manufacturers will gain more from an ongoing partnership with a specialist accounting firm.
If your team includes trained financial staff familiar with manufacturing cost structures, software might suffice. However, if your team is primarily operational, professional accounting oversight becomes invaluable.
The UK’s Making Tax Digital (MTD) reforms, ongoing R&D tax credit updates, and increasing HMRC scrutiny mean compliance risks are growing. Agencies like Pulse Accountants ensure businesses stay ahead of evolving obligations.
Companies planning expansion, mergers, or export operations require forward-looking financial forecasting — something software alone cannot provide effectively.
For manufacturers, success relies not only on accurate bookkeeping, but on the ability to turn financial information into strategic, margin-driving decisions. This is where a manufacturing-focused accountant like Pulse Accountants provides a significant competitive advantage.
“Manufacturers often underestimate how strategic accounting can be,” says Matt McConnell.
“When we partner with clients, we focus on helping them understand where profits are truly generated — whether by product line, production process, or customer segment — and how they can drive greater efficiency.”
Because Pulse specialises in manufacturing finance, our team goes far beyond traditional compliance work. We interpret financial data in the context of production realities, operational constraints, and sector-specific cost structures. Using advanced data analytics and trend analysis, Pulse Accountants routinely helps manufacturers identify:
By combining deep sector knowledge with analytical insight, Pulse Accountants helps manufacturers shift from reactive financial management to proactive strategy. Our guidance enables leadership teams to:
In short, Pulse Accountants acts as a strategic finance partner — not just an accounting provider — helping manufacturers build resilience, profitability, and sustainable competitive advantage.
In 2024, a Durham-based electronics manufacturer partnered with Pulse Accountants after using off-the-shelf software for three years. Within 12 months, the firm:
These results were achieved by combining data from Xero Manufacturing with expert interpretation and scenario modelling by Pulse Accountants’ specialists.
According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS):
Meanwhile, Deloitte’s Global Manufacturing Survey (2024) revealed that companies combining accounting software with professional oversight experience:
These findings reinforce that while software drives efficiency, human expertise remains irreplaceable in ensuring data accuracy and compliance.
In a sector where margins are tight and production cycles are increasingly complex, the way manufacturers manage their finances plays a critical role in long-term success. Modern accounting software delivers powerful automation and real-time visibility — but software alone cannot interpret trends, optimise costing, or navigate evolving regulatory demands.
As explored throughout this guide, the strongest results come from combining technology with specialist expertise. Software captures the data; manufacturing-focused accountants turn that data into strategic insight, improved pricing decisions, sharper forecasting, and stronger margins.
When choosing the right approach, manufacturers should consider their operational complexity, growth plans, and internal financial capability. For those seeking more than basic compliance — aiming instead for clarity, control, and competitive advantage — working with a specialist can provide the strategic edge needed for sustainable growth.
If you’re ready to strengthen your financial strategy, book a consultation with a manufacturing accounting specialist and explore how the right support can transform your performance.